1893년 전라도관찰사 金文鉉의 향약 시행과 운영 구조 - 남원부와 옥구현을 중심으로 - | |
조회수 : 2305 | 등록일 : 2021-09-03 |
The implementation of Hyangyak and Its Operational Structure by Kim Munhyun, the Governor of Jeolla-do Province in 1893 - Focusing on Namwonbu and Okguhyun -
Author : Han, Mi Ra
Page : 139-172 Abstract
This paper examined about the background information on implementation of Hyangyak in 1893 by Kim Munhyun, the Governor of Jeolla-do Province and the organization of executives, operation and financial affairs of Namwon Hyangyak and Okgu Hyangyak, which was implemented by his forcible press, based on the data from『Namwonbuhyangyakjeolchaseongchaek』of Namwonbu and『Okgu7myunhyangyakjeolmok』of Okguhyun. Kim Munhyun implemented Hyangyak in Jeolla-do Province to control the spread of Donghak as he was appointed as the Governor in 1983. And it has a strong chance that Hyangyak was implemented by the influence of Joseon Government. Namwon Hyangyak and Okgu Hyangyak shares some common elements in the structure of executives. They both assigned Dohyangyakjang, the leader in city level of the organization and buhyangyakjang, the secondary leader in city level. Also, there were myunyakjang and Saekjang in Myun and Byuljeom in Li. Looking at the major tasks of the executives in Namwon Hyangyak, mostly Yuhak, a scholar not serving the government position, took the role of Dohyangyakjang as well as Myunyakjang, Saekjang and Byulgeom. However, Lijeong was found, one level lower than Byulgeom who was an executive in Li, at Namwon Hyangyak. By researching about the Lijueog’s primary role based on “Doondeokbanghojeokjoongcho” it is highly possible that Lijeong belonged to a social class below the commoners.In 1893, It was emphasized to record virtue and vice based on “Sunjukjil” and “Akjukjil” which set the standard of good and evil person, rather than directly punishing as an application of Kwasilsanggyu in the operation of Namwon Hyangyak and Okgu Hyangyak. The emphasis on recording good and bad behavior was also confirmed from a case of hyangyak implemented in Kyungsang-do Province in 1893. In other words, hyangyak, which was implemented at the late 19th century was considered to control and reform hyangchon utilizing the recording of virtue and evil deed as opposed to punishing under the rule of Kwasilsangkyu. Also, the standard of good and bad people was not only a keeping of filial duty and brotherly love, and being a good neighbor but being cautious on heresy, keeping the duty to pay taxes and force labor, and observance of law. There are data remaining related to Hyangyakjun in Okgu Hyangyak. By looking at the data, Hyangyakjun was managed by Byulgeom in Li and the funds collected from Li was gathered by Myun to submit to Dohyangyakso. Moreover, as for Hyangyakjun, the amount of funds collected by each Li differ from one another. This confirms that the fee was collected based on the economic condition of household rather than the same amount was assigned to the members of Hyangyak. In case of Namwon Hyangyak and Okgu Hyangyak, response against Donghak and expenditure of Hyangyakjun can’t be identified due to the limitation in data. Through another case study regarding Hyangyak implemented in other regions of Jeolla-do Province the gap in this research will be completed in the future. <Key Words> Kim Munhyun, Namwon, Okgu, Byulgeom, Lijeong |
|
첨부파일 : 4. 한미라.pdf |
이전글 | 19세기 말 충청도 提川鄕約과 향약에서의 동학농민군 대응 양상 |
다음글 | 『鄕約通變』에 나타난 홍중삼의 鄕約觀 - 「주현향약」 절목을 중심으로 - |